Tuesday 4 June 2013

Shades of Manila 1945: Novel about Singapore deals with Japanese occupation






fa0cd t0603amadis book black feat6 1 196x300 Singapore Airlines Profit RisesThis long, ambitious novel is, like most recent and current Asian novels written in English, brilliant but with a difference: There are ghosts swarming all over the place.


It is a fictional history of Singapore from 1929, the year of the stock market crash in the United States, to the present. But, distinguo, as the Jesuits would say, it is a work of fiction and author Tan, wary perhaps of lawsuits, calls the city-state the Black Isle of the title.


A dead giveaway, however, is the map featured just before the text. It shows a large blackened island directly south (joined no doubt by a causeway) of the then British Malaya.


“The Black Isle” by Sandi Tan (Grand Central Publishing, NY, 2012; 469 pages) is a long flashback, with occasional shifts to the present. The narrator-heroine is Cassandra (Ling during her childhood), a psychic. Like the boy in the movie “Sixth Sense,” she sees “dead people.” And, when motivated, she can invoke the restless spirits to wreak havoc upon the land.


As the tale begins, we see Cassandra, now 88, living in self-exile in Tokyo, alone and friendless and not particularly caring about this. She has outlived all who have loved or hated her. Cassandra is, however, stalked by a Professor Maddin who is fascinated by her life story (and who, unknown to Cassandra, has her own agenda).


And Cassandra or Ling is persuaded to recount her incredible story.


Ling spent her childhood in Shanghai during the 1920s, when the city “was either the Pearl of the Orient (like Manila?) or the Devil’s Den.” The unloved child had a neurotic mother, an indifferent father and a twin brother with whom she had a near incestuous relationship.


The Wall Street crash in 1929 affects the family, and the father and the older twins (Ling and Li) are forced to migrate to the Black Isle to become “overseas Chinese.” Left behind are the mother and two younger children (also twins).


The island is a British colony.


Swirling around Cassandra are other fully realized characters: Daniel, scion of a rich family who falls in love with Cassandra; his sister Violet, who despises Cassandra; Issa, a shaman who becomes the revolutionary terrorist Isakandar; Cricket, an errand boy who becomes a businessman with many wives and children; Kenneth, a scheming politician and later prime minister with blood on his hands; and Taro, the charismatic Japanese officer who transforms Cassandra into a sex slave.


Surrealist images


The novel has many surrealist images, like a giant octopus making love to a Japanese woman, a ghostly dog-man and thousands of jellyfish clambering over the beach as war is about to erupt.


Under the Japanese yoke, the Isle deteriorated, just like Manila during the 1940s: “The rest of the city regressed.” And Cassandra asserts, “the Japanese were animals.”


“The Black Isle” is not the first Asian novel to document Japanese atrocities in fictional form, nor will it be the last. There is the recent “The Glass Palace” by Amitav Ghosh, and we have our own “Without Seeing the Dawn” by Stevan Javellana, “More than Conquerors” by Edilberto Tiempo,” and “Sugat ng Alaala” by National Artist-designate Lazaro Francisco.


For the Japanese, unlike the Germans, have not really repented of their World War II crimes. This is the reason behind the continuing tension between Japan on one hand, and China and the Koreas on the other.


The Chinese and Koreans have a sense of history; we don’t.


“The Black Isle” is available in Fully Booked, tel. 8587000; National Book Store; and PowerBooks.


Follow Us








fa0cd facebook likeus Singapore Airlines Profit Rises
c02ed twitter likeus Singapore Airlines Profit Rises
ccef8 youtube likeus Singapore Airlines Profit Rises







Recent Stories:



Tags:


Books

,


Lifestyle

,


Singapore

,


The Black Isle



Shades of Manila 1945: Novel about Singapore deals with Japanese occupation

Singapore: Internet freedom under threat

Alarm bells rang among the Singaporean online community as the government revealed a new licensing scheme for news websites that could potentially give a heavy blow to grassroots citizen journalism.


The Media Development Authority (MDA) has announced that Singaporean news websites with about 50,000 unique hits a month will now require individual licences to operate.


These licenses come with a 50,000-Singapore dollar (US $39,500) “performance bond” and a commitment to take down anything deemed to be in breach of content standards within 24 hours.


Ten websites were singled out in the MDA’s announcement as being in need of individual licences. Only one of them – Yahoo! Singapore – does not belong to a local mainstream media outlet. Yet the outcry among Singaporeans has shown that no one really believes the government will stop at these ten.


Singapore’s mainstream media has been licensed and regulated for years. Under the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act (NPPA) and the Broadcasting Act, the government has had the power to grant or deny permits to operate, as well as to appoint management shareholders.


This has led to a suppressed mainstream media reduced to favouring the state narrative in much of its coverage, constantly aware of its “accountability” to the government. The memoir of Cheong Yip Seng, former editor-in-chief of Singapore’s major newspaper The Straits Times, is just one chronicle of government interference in the media.


The advent of the internet shifted the balance. Singaporeans, used to the top-down method of communication, found themselves able to go from passive consumers to active producers of news, commentary and analysis. Rather than wait for the official take, it was now much easier for concerned citizens to participate.


But this democratisation of content production and discussion is now under threat from the new licensing regime. While commercial media outlets might be able to pay the hefty “performance bond”, it is difficult to think of a community blog that would be able to come up with such a sum. Without the ability to get a licence, these blogs would then have to shut down, depriving the public of both an information channel and a space to express themselves.


Will they, won’t they?


The MDA has clarified on its Facebook page that an “individual publishing views on current affairs and trends on his/her personal website or blog does not amount to news reporting” and would therefore not be required to apply for a licence.


However, it had previously told Reuters that it would keep an eye on blogs and “evaluate them accordingly”. Its clarification on individual blogs also did not address the issue of community blogs, set up by groups of citizen journalists.


The Online Citizen (TOC), one of the more prominent socio-political blogs in Singapore, has released statements indicating that it fulfils the criteria set forward by the MDA. However, the MDA claims that TOC does not fulfil the criteria, adding, “Should MDA determine later that it ought to be individually licensed, it will be notified”. 




It is a signal that the MDA wields the discretion in determining who does or does not fall within the stipulated criteria. This is worrying, especially when crucial definitions – such as what would make a website a news site – are kept disconcertingly broad. The MDA defines a “news programme” as “any programme (whether or not the programme is presenter-based and whether or not the programme is provided by a third party) containing any news, intelligence, report of occurrence, or any matter of public interest, about any social, economic, political, cultural, artistic, sporting, scientific or any other aspect of Singapore in any language (whether paid or free and whether at regular interval or otherwise) but does not include any programme produced by or on behalf of the Government.”


Similarly, the definition of “prohibited content” as set out in the MDA’s Internet Code of Practice is just as opaque. It states that any material deemed “objectionable on the grounds of public interest, public morality, public order, public security, national harmony, or is otherwise prohibited by applicable Singapore laws” could be banned.


Deliberate or not, this vagueness causes no end of uncertainty for Singaporean bloggers. Unable to discern how and when the MDA makes its decisions, these new regulations become a shadow that hangs over everyone. The possibility of a “chilling effect” is all too real.


As retired journalist Bertha Henson - now a blogger with Breakfast Networkwrites: “What should I do now? Odd that my fellow members on Breakfast Network and I would have to think about how NOT to make ourselves so popular that we would breach the 50,000 threshold. Even if we have $50,000 to spare, it’s not nice to have to wonder about phone calls in the night or an email to demand that a post be deleted. And it’s not nice to have to second guess what the [Government] (or which god in which department) thinks about this post or that and that particular god-person’s threshold of ‘sensitivity’.”


A political tool


While the government continues to insist that the new licensing scheme is being put in place to create more “consistency” in the regulation of print, broadcast and online media, the potential for these licences to be used as political tools is obvious.


The mainstream media can usually be counted on to stay fairly close to the government line, but the accessibility of online media has given citizens an opportunity to express themselves. This has led to more criticism of the state, and the political awakening of many “apathetic” Singaporeans.


Alternative views have been shared freely online, on blogs and social media, which very likely led to an increase in support for alternative political parties. Opposition politicians, previously painted as social pariahs, are now seen in a different light, and the fear of being identified as an opposition supporter has been significantly reduced. In fact, the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) had never performed as badly as it did in the last general election in 2011, where it received 60 percent of the vote.


This is why the latest media regulation has been interpreted as a government attempt to cling on to power by any means necessary. By introducing a new licensing regime that could effectively shut down socio-political blogs – many of which tend to be critical of the incumbent party – the PAP is seen as censoring the internet and silencing the opposition.


The government has so far been unsuccessful in fighting that perception. The Minister for Communications and Information, Dr Yaacob Ibrahim, has indicated the government’s intention to amend the Broadcasting Act to include overseas-based websites that write about Singapore. In an interview with the BBC, he said: “We want to protect the interest of the ordinary Singaporean. As long as they go online to read the news I think it’s important to make sure that they read the ‘right thing’, insofar as if there’s an event yesterday it is reported accurately.”


It is a situation that brings little satisfaction to anyone. The backlash can already be felt. Singaporean bloggers have already come together to launch the #FreeMyInternet campaign, calling for an online blackout in the run up to a protest demanding the government to withdraw licensing. The government was mistaken if it had thought that it could seize control of the internet without any outcry, and this licensing regime could be causing headache on both sides for quite a while yet.


Kirsten Han is a freelance journalist and blogger from Singapore, with an interest in human rights and social justice issues. She is currently a Master’s student in Journalism, Media and Communication at Cardiff University.


Follow her on Twitter: @kixes




1411



The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.



Singapore: Internet freedom under threat

Eight New and Affordable Hotels to Stay in Singapore for 2013

  •  Singapore Airlines Profit Rises

2f447 gI 72585 Singapore%2520Business%2520District%2520Skyline%2520at%2520Dusk Singapore Airlines Profit Rises


These new budget hotels couldn’t choose a better time than now to open. There is a huge pent-up demand from travelers for cheaper accommodation.


Singapore (PRWEB) May 27, 2013


Underpinned by healthy hospitality outlook, hotel openings have sprouted throughout Singapore to support the increase in international visitors. Eight new budget hotels have since opened in Singapore this year.


The new hotel developments are built on the numerous new attractions to Singapore’s tourism landscape such as the opening of River Safari, Marine Life Park and Gardens by the Bay. In addition, the estimated 15 million visitors’ arrival to Singapore in 2013 has pushed up the demand for hotel rooms.


With the average room rate hovering around US$205 in 2012 (according to Singapore Tourism Board’s statistics) and Singapore being rated the sixth most expensive city in the world according to a recent survey conducted by London-based Economic Intelligence Unit, the opening of these eight new budget hotels certainly provides a cheaper alternative for the cost-conscious travelers.


“These new budget hotels couldn’t choose a better time than now to open. There is a huge pent-up demand from travelers for cheaper accommodation and especially visitors from countries like Indonesia, Philippines and Malaysia. Also, as part of the hotels’ opening marketing drive, these hotels will be offering special Singapore hotel promotions that discerning travelers should take advantage of,” says Danny Lee of BudgetHotels.sg, an online hotel guide platform specializing in listing budget hotels near MRT train stations.


Check out the eight new budget hotels highlighted below:


1)    Days Hotel Singapore at Zhongshan Park

A three-star hotel with 405 rooms under the well-known Days Inn hotel chain and located in Balestier/Novena area.


2)     Venue Hotel

A Perankan-style hotel in a restored Chinese shophouse characterized by colorful themed-rooms and is located within walking distance to Paya Lebar MRT train station.


3)    Hotel Clover

Within walking distance to Bugis MRT train station, the rooms are Scandinavian-inspired and equipped with work-desk and free Wi-Fi for business travelers.


4)    The Seacare Hotel

A stylish and contemporary business hotel with 103 rooms that is located in Chinatown district and within 10-minute walk to Chinatown MRT train station.


5)    Bliss Hotel Singapore

A boutique hotel with avant-garde rooms and free Wi-Fi that is located near the vicinity of Chinatown MRT train station.


6)    The Daulat Hotel

A quirky hotel with Persian-designed elements straddling Bugis and Little India districts and is blessed with close proximity to either MRT train stations.


7)    Big Hotel

A mid-size hotel in downtown Bugis with 300 over rooms and all rooms come with Serta mattress and free Wi-Fi.


8)    Amaris Hotel Bugis, Singapore

A small and no-frills budget hotel conveniently located in Bugis and within short walking distance to Suntec Convention and Exhibition Center that will appeal to the budget-conscious business travelers.


For more information on each of the hotels listed above, please visit http://www.budgethotels.sg/new-hotels-in-singapore-2013/


About BudgetHotels.sg

Created by a local expert, http://www.budgethotels.sg is a first-of-its kind hotel guide platform in Singapore that provides a compilation of budget hotels in Singapore with key information like the location of nearby MRT train stations, popular local food haunts and shopping places.


 Singapore Airlines Profit Rises




PDF



Print




Eight New and Affordable Hotels to Stay in Singapore for 2013

Wyndham Hotel Group debuts two brands in Singapore

Wyndham Hotel Group, part of Wyndham Worldwide Corporation recently announced the company’s entry into Singapore with the opening of two properties: Ramada Singapore at Zhongshan Park and Days Hotel Singapore at Zhongshan Park.


Ramada Singapore at Zhongshan Park has 384 rooms and include a full service restaurant, fitness center, swimming pool, business centre and pillarless ballroom for events. Days Hotel Singapore at Zhongshan Park has 405 rooms, featuring a range of amenities including a full-service restaurant and a fitness centre.


Both hotels, now opened and managed by Wyndham Hotel Group, are located at Zhongshan Park, the newest development area in Singapore, and are part of an integrated development that includes a commercial tower and shopping mall.



Wyndham Hotel Group debuts two brands in Singapore

Singapore"s Classiest Afternoon Tea: Fullerton Bay Hotel

17b4b Fullerton Bay Hotel Tea Landing Point Singapore Airlines Profit Rises


The venue itself is Landing Point, the hotel’s swanky all-day dining spot. And in addition to its gorgeous surroundings (the paved marble floor and crystal sculptures dangling over the bar really completed the look), we were totally impressed by the service.


Our waiter not only helped us pick out our preferred tea from a menu of around 20 different blends (black, green, herbal, you name it), but when our tea arrived, he even unscrewed the honey jar, spooned out a little, and stirred it into the cup for us! The only time we even lifted a finger was to drink it.


If we had happened to be in the mood for a cocktail at 3 in the afternoon (not something we generally make a habit of), there would have been plenty of options for that, too, as the bar is filled with endless bottles lined up along the shelves. Thankfully, our appointment was business-related, so tea and a biscuit was plenty.


Afternoon Tea is clearly a thing in lots of hotels, but this may just be the classiest act we’ve encountered so far. To experience it yourself, show up between 3pm and 5:30pm, though Landing Point is open all day (7am-midnight Sun-Thurs; 7am-1am Fri-Sat).


[Photos: HotelChatter]



Singapore"s Classiest Afternoon Tea: Fullerton Bay Hotel

Monday 3 June 2013

In Singapore, A Rare Call for Protest Against Blogging Censorship





4332e print Three day Natas Travel Fair 2013 opens at Singapore Expo



Student Scott Teng (L) speaks during a demonstration at “Speaker’s Corner” in Singapore October 5, 2008, when a small group protested against censorship at a university newspaper. (Photo: Reuters)


Singapore’s blogging community is rebelling against a stringent new law that requires online news sites to put up a performance bond of US $40,000 and to submit to government censorship, calling for the general public and bloggers to rally next Saturday against the measure.


Last Tuesday, the Singapore Media Development Authority issued the new regulations, which it said were designed to place the websites “on a more consistent regulatory framework with traditional news platforms which are already individually licensed.”


The protest group, calling itself “Free My Internet,” is asking Singaporeans to rally in Hong Lim Park, the site of Singapore’s speaker’s corner, where a May 1 protest drew 3,000 participants protesting the government’s plans to let in vast numbers of new immigrants. It was said to be the biggest protest crowd in Singapore in modern times.


“We encourage all Singaporeans who are concerned about our future and our ability to participate in everyday online activities and discussions, and to seek out alternative news and analysis, to take a strong stand against the licensing regime which can impede on your independence,” the organizers said.

“We urge Singaporeans to turn up to send a clear message to our elected representatives to trust the Singaporeans who elected them.”


The message was signed by 35 bloggers, who asked all Singapore bloggers to go black for 24 hours from midnight June 6.


“You can choose to create your own blackout notice, or use www.freemyinternet.com we have created for your convenience,” the group said. “When you reopen your blog, write your account of the protest, about the new regulations and censorship, or anything related to media freedom in Singapore. Share your thoughts. Share your hope that the light that free speech provides will not go out on us.”


The Speaker’s Corner, modeled after London’s free speech site of the same name, is hardly free. Demonstrations are allowed only by Singapore citizens and attended by Singapore citizens. Banners, films, flags, photographs, placards, posters, signs, writing or other visible representations or paraphernalia containing violent, lewd or obscene material must not be displayed or exhibited, the government says.

Events must not deal with any matter that relates directly or indirectly to any religious belief or to religion generally, or which may cause feelings of enmity, hatred, ill-will or hostility between different racial or religious groups.

Events adhering to the regulations are not immune from other existing laws, such as those relating to defamation and sedition, which in Singapore can be extremely broad, especially when the Lee governing family is mentioned.


Asia Sentinel’s attempts to reach the Media Development Authority by telephone and email went unanswered last week.

The Singapore-based Channel News Asia, however, quoted the agency in an article on May 29 as saying the new licensing framework “is not intended to clamp down on internet freedom,” adding that the regulations will only apply to news sites that meet the content and reach criteria.


But while the government was characterizing the new regulations as merely bringing the internet into line with print publication restrictions, the protesters said, they apply to all content on the news sites including readers’ comments. In the recent past, the Singapore government has gone after news sites for not erasing what are deemed to be offending comments fast enough, threatening lawsuits.


Any blog that reaches more than 50,000 unique visitors in a month and prints a single article of Singapore news within two weeks is liable to come under the regulation and to be forced to withdraw the story within 24 hours or be faced with forfeiting the bond although the bigger problem, for most bloggers, is coming up with the money in the first place.


Although bloggers have been a circumspect presence in Singapore for more than a decade, the government apparently grew irritated by reporting particularly by Yahoo News, the giant news aggregator that claims nearly 700 million Internet readers across the planet, for carrying stories on the arrest and deportations of striking Chinese bus drivers last December and the aftermath.


Among sites named as currently falling under the MDA’s guidelines, including Asia One, Business Times, Channel News Asia, Omy, Stomp, Straits Times, TNP, Today Online, Zaobao, and Yahoo, Channel News Asia reported.


“The License also makes it clear that online news sites are expected to comply within 24 hours to the MDA’s directions to remove content that is found to be in breach of content standards,” the authority said on its website.


Presumably, that would mean Yahoo must remove the offending articles about the striking bus drivers, Leslie Chew and others within 24 hours of being notified by the authority. In particular, the MDA said the websites must take down content that “is prejudicial to racial harmony.”


Related Posts :



In Singapore, A Rare Call for Protest Against Blogging Censorship

In Singapore, A Rare Call for Protest Against Blogging Censorship





71683 print Singapore GDP expands by 1.3% in 2012



Student Scott Teng (L) speaks during a demonstration at “Speaker’s Corner” in Singapore October 5, 2008, when a small group protested against censorship at a university newspaper. (Photo: Reuters)


Singapore’s blogging community is rebelling against a stringent new law that requires online news sites to put up a performance bond of US $40,000 and to submit to government censorship, calling for the general public and bloggers to rally next Saturday against the measure.


Last Tuesday, the Singapore Media Development Authority issued the new regulations, which it said were designed to place the websites “on a more consistent regulatory framework with traditional news platforms which are already individually licensed.”


The protest group, calling itself “Free My Internet,” is asking Singaporeans to rally in Hong Lim Park, the site of Singapore’s speaker’s corner, where a May 1 protest drew 3,000 participants protesting the government’s plans to let in vast numbers of new immigrants. It was said to be the biggest protest crowd in Singapore in modern times.


“We encourage all Singaporeans who are concerned about our future and our ability to participate in everyday online activities and discussions, and to seek out alternative news and analysis, to take a strong stand against the licensing regime which can impede on your independence,” the organizers said.

“We urge Singaporeans to turn up to send a clear message to our elected representatives to trust the Singaporeans who elected them.”


The message was signed by 35 bloggers, who asked all Singapore bloggers to go black for 24 hours from midnight June 6.


“You can choose to create your own blackout notice, or use www.freemyinternet.com we have created for your convenience,” the group said. “When you reopen your blog, write your account of the protest, about the new regulations and censorship, or anything related to media freedom in Singapore. Share your thoughts. Share your hope that the light that free speech provides will not go out on us.”


The Speaker’s Corner, modeled after London’s free speech site of the same name, is hardly free. Demonstrations are allowed only by Singapore citizens and attended by Singapore citizens. Banners, films, flags, photographs, placards, posters, signs, writing or other visible representations or paraphernalia containing violent, lewd or obscene material must not be displayed or exhibited, the government says.

Events must not deal with any matter that relates directly or indirectly to any religious belief or to religion generally, or which may cause feelings of enmity, hatred, ill-will or hostility between different racial or religious groups.

Events adhering to the regulations are not immune from other existing laws, such as those relating to defamation and sedition, which in Singapore can be extremely broad, especially when the Lee governing family is mentioned.


Asia Sentinel’s attempts to reach the Media Development Authority by telephone and email went unanswered last week.

The Singapore-based Channel News Asia, however, quoted the agency in an article on May 29 as saying the new licensing framework “is not intended to clamp down on internet freedom,” adding that the regulations will only apply to news sites that meet the content and reach criteria.


But while the government was characterizing the new regulations as merely bringing the internet into line with print publication restrictions, the protesters said, they apply to all content on the news sites including readers’ comments. In the recent past, the Singapore government has gone after news sites for not erasing what are deemed to be offending comments fast enough, threatening lawsuits.


Any blog that reaches more than 50,000 unique visitors in a month and prints a single article of Singapore news within two weeks is liable to come under the regulation and to be forced to withdraw the story within 24 hours or be faced with forfeiting the bond although the bigger problem, for most bloggers, is coming up with the money in the first place.


Although bloggers have been a circumspect presence in Singapore for more than a decade, the government apparently grew irritated by reporting particularly by Yahoo News, the giant news aggregator that claims nearly 700 million Internet readers across the planet, for carrying stories on the arrest and deportations of striking Chinese bus drivers last December and the aftermath.


Among sites named as currently falling under the MDA’s guidelines, including Asia One, Business Times, Channel News Asia, Omy, Stomp, Straits Times, TNP, Today Online, Zaobao, and Yahoo, Channel News Asia reported.


“The License also makes it clear that online news sites are expected to comply within 24 hours to the MDA’s directions to remove content that is found to be in breach of content standards,” the authority said on its website.


Presumably, that would mean Yahoo must remove the offending articles about the striking bus drivers, Leslie Chew and others within 24 hours of being notified by the authority. In particular, the MDA said the websites must take down content that “is prejudicial to racial harmony.”


Related Posts :



In Singapore, A Rare Call for Protest Against Blogging Censorship